Kendall Marshall was, not surprisingly, mentioned during the question and answer session.

The final moments before the NBA draft are quickly slipping away and teams across the NBA are frantically making last minute preparations for the big event. Lance Blanks took time out of his busy schedule to meet with the press and answer questions in anticipation of the upcoming tempest.

It was a considerable concession of time given the circumstances, since Blanks and the rest of the Suns' staff still have their work cut out for them this week. According to Blanks, "Right now it's a really ugly board because it doesn't have a ton of clarity." Not to fret, though, because the board may still be convoluted now, but the Suns' team of scouts will help set an unequivocal order by Thursday afternoon.

Although Blanks seemed pretty confident the Suns will keep the #13 pick, he did reflect that nothing is set in stone. There is always a (remote) possibility they could trade up or down.

The Suns' eventual board may have up to 16/17 players on it that they would be interested in. If the Suns do end up with a player/s on their board past their pick, that brings up another question - will the Suns add another pick on draft day? The answer... maybe. Blanks offered that if it makes sense, they will look into it. Adding youth is extremely important.

Jump it for more notes from the media session along with comments on Marshall and Moultrie and quotes from Blanks.

***Additional Quotes and Editorial Content Have Been Added.***

On Kendall Marshall:

One is an obviously well accomplished, winning point guard. Quite frankly, that's the thing I like the most about him. He's a winner. That's something that we aspire to do, obviously, in this business. More specifically that's a position of need.

On Arnett Moultrie:

The other kid offers a level of athleticism. He's still trending up, getting better as a player, so that's someone that could potentially grow with an organization.

In reference to the revisits for these two players:

As far as the revisit - it never hurts to get another look.

Visits by players do impact opinion (not just the workout, but how the player acts and reacts during the visit), but that doesn't mean the Suns wouldn't select a player that hasn't visited.

I think of it like a pie chart. There is a percentage of your evaluation - every team is different - that is based on the season and how a guy might have played. Some teams may not need the other data. A percentage may go into Chicago (Combine), the post season, the interview, and the actual workout in your city. Seeing a guy in your gym in your environment, silly things like does he fit your city, your fans, and your organization. If he is not here I don't think you won't take him, but it might impact it especially if you are looking at two people and one of them has been in here.

It appears that the Suns will look at a PG in free agency (regardless of whether they draft Marshall) - rookies are long term situations, most won't contribute right away. Yes, Nash qualifies as a free agent point guard.

There's a lot more information available today about the draft because of technology and media.

Blanks believes that there are good players available at every position in this draft. Looking at wings is more a function of the roster. The player they draft will likely be based on the order on their board.

No philosophy change. The perimeter scorers is mostly a function of our roster than it is the draft class because we think there are good players at every position. Incidentally, we have had players in here from every position. It's not a situation where because we think guys are going to be gone at that position and definitely draft a five or a one. It is a sliding scale maybe you take the best player for whatever reason; maybe you go away from the point guard spot and go to the three. There really is no philosophy shift. We'll put on the final nuts and bolts over the next two or three days and we'll have a board. We will stay pretty loyal to that in the process of making a decision.

Continuity in the staff is increasing. Blanks believes that the staff and support team is excellent and has been working very hard to successfully navigate the draft and free agency in the brief upcoming window. There was another mention about Sarver providing great resources (The staff doth protest too much, methinks).

I am wildly excited about this group and the biggest difference is continuity. The continuity, camaraderie, and trust built amongst each other I am certain at some level will show up in our selection.

This last quote from Blanks reverberated for me:

Right now we're overly focused on this draft because we want to hit it right. If that means a duplication at a spot, so be it, because at the end of the day you want to have talented players and guys that can make it in this league and contribute to your roster. That's better than going away from a position where you already have depth or have an opportunity through free agency and you end up with a player that can't play in the league or he's just not good enough.

Here's the way I interpreted the Suns draft strategy based on Blanks' comments. I believe that by Thursday the Suns will have a draft board with between 13-17 players they like as potential picks. I think the players will be slotted by number (not in tiers) and that if the teams ahead of the Suns take the first 12 players on the Suns' board, the Suns will select the player they have slotted 13th. If only 10 players on the Suns' board are taken in the top 12, the Suns will select the 11th player on their board, etc.

I don't know that the Suns don't have players ranked as 13A and 13B, and if both are on the board they won't select the player who fits a need best between the two, but I don't get the impression they are using a tiered system. It appears to me to be a straightforward "best on board" approach, but this is just my take, nothing incontrovertible.

Whether the Suns add a pick largely depends on how many players they end up putting on their board (which they haven't determined yet) and whether any of those players fall to spots where the Suns can acquire picks. E.g. If they Suns have 15 players on their board and they are gone by 28, they won't try to acquire the Thunder's pick to take a player they don't like. If they have 17 on their board and one is left at 28, they will try to acquire the pick. It just depends on whether players are still available at spots where the Suns can trade for extra picks.

So what do you think Brightsiders? Are you more confident, less confident, or indifferent? Anything here that catches your eye?

PHOENIX — There’s no set formula and no special front office potion to the 2012 NBA Draft. It’ll all come down to preference, fit and, ultimately, research to determine what player...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]
Looks a little like Rashard Lewis

Mississippi State big man Arnett Moultrie visited the Phoenix Suns on Sunday for the second time in a week. Clearly, he impressed the Phoenix brass with his skills amongst last Saturday's big man group that included lottery talents John Henson, Tyler Zeller, Meyers Leonard and Perry Jones.

So who the heck is Arnett Moultrie?

Let's hear it from Mike Schmitz, who writes for and does pre-draft scouting videos for

"Moultrie has the skills of a guard yet the size of a big man. He's one of the most unique players in the draft in that he's a freak athlete with good skills and has yet to scratch the surface of his potential even after transferring from UTEP and making the rounds in the collegiate circuit.

"The difference between Moultrie and (Perry) Jones is that he has a good motor and crashes the glass hard. He can also stretch it to three-point range where he's steadily improving. He's been slotted in the mid-teens and the Suns could get a steal if Moultrie's skills translate as planned to the NBA."

Kris Habbas, who writes for SBNation AZ and, adds this about Moultrie: "Moultrie is the steal of the draft at this point to me."

At the moment, Moultrie is under heavy consideration in Detroit at #9, so he may be gone by the time the Suns pick. He has visited several other teams in the top 10 as well and just like with the Suns, he has impressed in workouts thanks to his unique physical skills and unbridled self-confidence.

Moultrie can rebound the heck out of the ball, on both the offensive end and the defensive end. Let's hear it from Moultrie's coach in Schmitz's scouting video, referring to the big man who led the SEC in rebounding this past year: "One thing you can hang your hat on is that he's an NBA rebounder today. You don't lead this league in rebounding (at 10.5, beating out Anthony Davis among others) if that's something you can't do."

What does Moultrie himself think he can provide as a rookie? "Right away, just being a big man, running the floor, rebounding the basketball and bringing the energy I have every night."

Great, so he's a freak athlete who can rebound. But can he score? The Suns need a scorer down on the blocks.

Offensively, Moultrie is very versatile but not great in any one area. Can score on isolations (post ups, face up and drive or shoot) and shoot mid to long range. The biggest percentage of his scoring comes on cuts to the basket at more than 20% of shots - which he makes more than 81% of the time. Very good scoring at the rim; can score with either hand and in traffic. "He's the whole package," says his coach.

Defensively, aside from rebounding? For his part, Moultrie has great confidence in himself on the defensive end: "I'm a good defender. I'm a smart defender. I can guard three positions, three through five."

On film, he is a very good on-the-ball defender - allowing only 16% shooting in those situations. But his help defense is nonexistent - which won't show up in workouts. There are also some questions on his consistency (on/off switch) and general basketball IQ. And for some reason, he has never averaged more than one block per game despite his length and agility.

But the biggest potential concern? Character. He is already on his second NBA agent, on his second college team, and his body language is really bad when he's ignored on the court (walking around, head hung, stops fighting for ball). Even threw his last team under the bus during 5-game losing streak, admitting he hadn't said anything to them before unloading on them in the media. Immaturity? Sure. But certain to go away when making millions a year? Not likely.

Kris Habbas has a more forgiving take on Moultrie's character questions, based on facts more than conjecture: "He was not highly recruited so started at Texas El-Paso. He had to try and co-exist with Renardo Sidney and an incompetent head coach. I agree he has some maturity to go through as does any 21 year old. He will be 22 in the first month or so of the season and the team he lands on will determine his development. If he lands on an incompetent team he will struggle.

"Falling in the draft will be a blessing in disguise for Moultrie's career."

Moultrie has as much talent as any big man after Anthony Davis in this draft, yet he's rated only in the teens by guys who talk to GMs on a daily basis. He is a boom (Jermaine O'Neal, Kris Humphries) or bust (Jason Thompson) player in the true sense of the word.

"I'm definitely the sleeper of the draft," Moultrie said in a recent interview. "But that's fine, they can sleep on me. I've been a sleeper all my life."

Take some time to watch this incredible scouting report on Moultrie, which contributed to much of this story today:

And then watch his draft combine interview, explaining how he did not throw his teammates under any buses:

Boom or bust, with this guy. Boom or bust.

Should the Suns draft Moultrie at 13?

  373 votes | Results

Will Ersan Ilyasova (7) don the orange and purple next season?

We are one week from free agency. At midnight June 30, all player contracts for the 2011-12 season expire and those players not under contract for the 2012-13 season become free agents. At that moment, and not a moment before, teams can officially begin courting those free agents to sign with their team.

The lucky ones get a call that night, and the truly fortunate get more than one. Often those calls are simply "hey, we love you and want you here. Give us a chance to top any competitor", rather than a solid contract offer, because you never want to outbid yourself. And you might want to call all of your Plan A, B and C candidates just to lodge interest.

Certainly, Deron Williams and Steve Nash's agents will get calls. Lots of them, even from teams unwilling or unable to offer competitive salaries.

The Suns are reportedly interested in four of the top 5 unrestricted free agents this summer, per this recent ranking of the Top 20 unrestricted free agents: PGs Deron Williams, Goran Dragic and Steve Nash, as well as PF Ersan Ilyasova. Of course, another 10-20 teams are interested in those same players to varying degrees, so their agents will be busy on the night of July 1.

Certainly, they don't want to sign all four of those players, who will likely be paid $45 million in 2012-13 between them. But the Suns will want all of them to know of their interest. Reportedly, Deron Williams' agent will say "thanks but no thanks", while the others will say "thanks, and we'll get back to you soon".

Interest in Ilyasova likely depends on the draft (picks and/or trades), while interest in the three point guards is hierarchical. But they will still make all of these players aware of their interest.

Most likely, the order of these players' commitments to new teams will be: Williams first, Nash second, Dragic third. And all three players know this, whether they like it or not. If the Mavericks lose out on Williams, they will likely turn to Nash. If the Suns lose out on Nash, they will likely turn to Dragic. (and then, if all else fails, reportedly to Raymond Felton via multiple outlets...ugh...).

Interest in shooting guards, like the Ilyasova situation, likely depends on the draft as well. If the Suns come away from the draft without a new SG, then Paul Coro mentions Nick Young and the possibility of interest in Eric Gordon, while John Gambodoro mentioned Randy Foye and OJ Mayo (restricted) as potential Suns targets. Shannon Brown is out there as well, loves the Suns and would love to come back. Signing any of these guys in the first week of July would be a mistake because the first week is seller's market (high salaries). Agreeing later in July could mean a significant savings.

Free agents NOT mentioned yet, that I'd hoped the Suns would be reportedly interested in: Nicolas Batum (restricted), Brandon Rush, George Hill.

Free agents NOT mentioned yet, and I'm really glad: Jamal Crawford (too old and one-dimensional), Ryan Andersen (no better than Frye), Michael Beasley (headcase), Jason Terry (old, but small), and Lou Williams (young, but small)

Reading Babby's comments leads me to the following conclusions:

  1. Suns will register their interest in a lot of free agents on July 1
  2. Suns will resolve the Nash situation first
  3. If the Suns want Ilyasova, they will have to commit right away. He will get lots of offers. I only see the Suns doing this if Lopez and/or Frye are no longer in the team's plans.
  4. All other free agents will come in a trickle. None are worth a bunch of money, no matter how the draft goes.

The draft starts it all off on Thursday, then whatever the Suns don't get on June 28 they will try to fill on July 1 and later.

As Babby says to Coro for the "The overall goal is to begin the process of returning to elite status and add talent and add people to infuse youth into the team," Babby said. "There is no limitation in resources available to us to improve the team. There are no artificial restraints other than the rules and good judgment.

"We are prepared to be very active with the players who are our targets. I have complete confidence that we'll be an attractive destination for them."

Git er done!

Sully going to work in the post. That poor Michigan guy doesn't have a chance.

With the NBA Draft fast approaching on June 28th, we at Bright Side of the Sun want to cover all the bases regarding the possible players who the Phoenix Suns could draft with the #13th pick.

General Manager Lance Blanks has expressed his high opinion of this year's wing crop, and the Suns certainly do need help on the perimeter. However, there might also be spot opening in the frontcourt as reserve center Robin Lopez is a restricted free agent and is not guaranteed to return. With the recently reported lottery promises to shooting guards Dion Waiters and Austin Rivers, there is a very good chance a top ten caliber big men will be available for the Suns at 13.

Today's draft coverage focuses on one of those big men that could slide to the Suns: power forward Jared Sullinger of the Ohio State University Buckeyes.

Sullinger was a top-flight recruit coming out of high school who lived up to the hype as a freshman at Ohio State, posting a double-double and leading the Buckeyes to a 34-3 record and an appearance in the Sweet Sixteen of the NCAA Tournament. If Sullinger had decided to enter the NBA Draft after that one year, he likely would have been taken in the top 5.

Instead, Sullinger returned to the Buckeyes, put up similar stats and led the team on another Sweet Sixteen run. Sullinger showcased the same toughness and strength that made him a force on the block, but he also showed expanded range on his jump shot.

So then why could Sullinger be available for the Suns at 13? Make the jump to find out.

So who is Jared Sullinger?

  • Measurables: 6-foot-9 in shoes, 268 lbs., 7-foot-1.25 wingspan
  • Position: Power Forward/Center
  • Age: 20 years old (two years of college)
  • College: Ohio State University
  • Accolades: 2011 Big Ten Freshman of the Year, 2011 Big Ten Tournament MVP, 2011 and 2012 Consensus First Team All-American
  • NBA Comparisons: Best case - Luis Scola, Kevin Love, Carlos Boozer; Worst case - Glen Davis, DeJuan Blair

Per Game Stats:

2010-11 Ohio State Big Ten 37 31.7 6.0 11.1 .541 0.1 0.3 .250 5.1 7.2 .704 10.2 1.2 1.0 0.5 1.6 2.4 17.2
2011-12 Ohio State Big Ten 37 30.4 6.2 11.9 .519 0.4 1.1 .400 4.7 6.2 .768 9.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.9 2.9 17.5
Career Ohio State 74 31.0 6.1 11.5 .530 0.3 0.7 .365 4.9 6.7 .733 9.7 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.8 2.7 17.3
Provided by View Original Table
Generated 6/18/2012.

Advanced Stats:

2010-11 Ohio State Big Ten 37 1172 30.3 .591 .545 14.1 26.0 20.1 7.4 2.0 2.0 9.9 27.0 126.0 89.6 3.9 4.2 8.2
2011-12 Ohio State Big Ten 37 1123 30.2 .591 .538 12.4 23.9 18.2 8.6 2.3 4.0 11.5 27.9 121.8 85.8 4.1 5.2 9.3
Career Ohio State 74 2295 30.3 .591 .541 13.3 25.0 19.2 8.0 2.1 3.0 10.7 27.4 123.9 87.7 8.1 9.4 17.5
Provided by View Original Table
Generated 6/18/2012.


Sullinger is a beast on the block and a monster on the boards. At 6-foot-9, Sullinger has a wide, strong base and the knowledge to use it to his advantage. His entire game is based on positioning. He has a Kevin Love-like knack for being in the right place at the right time when a shot goes up, and uses his body very well to secure the rebound.

Sullinger is more polished in the post than most college big men, which is what makes him so tough to defend. He has excellent footwork and a soft touch around the basket. He's a bruiser who loves contact and has the strength to finish through it. He has the ability to establish deep post position, and is tough to stop when he gets that close to the basket. If he can continue to refine his game and add another move or two to his arsenal he'll be an excellent offensive option.

Sullinger complements his blossoming post game with an improving outside shot. He has a nice stroke from mid-range and shoots free throws at a good rate for a big man. This season Sullinger even extended his range to the college 3-point arc, hitting 40 percent of his attempts from deep on the year. He also shows a little bit of a face-up game, which allows him to be effective both from the low and high post.

While he's not a point-forward by any stretch of the imagination, he is a willing passer who will kick it out of double-teams, which often results in hockey assists and open shots for other teammates. He also improved as a defender in his second year and is a solid positional post defender.


Sullinger's biggest problem heading into the NBA is that he's not overly athletic, nor is he very tall for an NBA big. Short, earth-bound and slow-footed is not a good combination. The results of his athletic test were very poor at the combine. He was the slowest of all the power forwards that participated, and his max vertical leap was fourth to last at just 31 inches. He also did poorly in the bench press with only 9 reps, tied for second worst. His conditioning is not the greatest either, as even though he lost about ten pounds between his freshman and sophomore year his body fat percentage is still high at 10.7%.

We saw a glimpse of what might happen to him in the NBA when he played against college teams with more length in the froncourt. For example, he went just 5-19 with 13 points against Kansas and their 7-footer Jeff Withey. He gets his shot blocked far too often around the basket. And there are times where he just throws himself into the defense hoping for a foul call or that the shot would go in. He needs to play under control more and make smart decisions around the basket. Sullinger will have to prove he can still be effective when he's not playing against guys his size or smaller. His lack of athleticism also hurts him on defense, as he's not going to be much of a rim protector.

But even more troubling is that his back was medically red-flagged by doctors at the combine. Sullinger missed some time as a sophomore due to back problems, and this latest development could scare some teams off.


Sullinger isn't the prototypical big man that we have seen succeed in Phoenix's system. While his jumper is improving, he's much more of an inside threat than a stretch four. Plus, with the drafting of Markieff Morris last season and the wholes in other areas, a power forward may not hold as much value for the Suns in this draft.

However, he's a darn good player and based on talent alone should be gone long before the Suns pick. Should the Suns' trainers sign off on Sullinger's back, the Suns should take a long look at drafting him at 13 if he falls.

Should the Suns take Sullinger if he's still available at 13?

  350 votes | Results

Page 1213 of 1893


Web Links

Sponsored Ads