If you were an NBA fan, a sneaker aficionado, or a television owner in 2007, you probably saw this commercial at least 30 times. This one-minute ad, intended to sell sneakers to the masses, was a...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Hey there, hi there, ho there, Bright Siders!

While the Suns have been in flux, we here at the best Suns blog in the nation have been trucking along at a dizzying pace. We've got fresh content on a regular basis, and you guys are reading it and commenting on it like crazy every single day! Offseason schmoffseason.

But it wasn't always like this. I remember when I started fanposting in the summer of 2010, there was a little more time between front-page stories, and fanposts were more relevant in the scheme of things. The authored content was great when it hit the home page, don't get me wrong, but my recollection back then was a more even playing field between authored content and fanposts. I remember regularly hitting the 'fanpost' tab at the top of the page to scour the latest comments and view activity.

Fanposts are where I got my start at BSotS. Same for Eutychus (Leiland Tanner). Beavis used to write a lot more of them, as well as many of the rest of you.

It's time to bring back the Fanpost!

We want to hear from you. We want fresh voices with solid, impassioned takes on the Suns and/or the NBA in general. I know there's good writers out there by the number of long, long comments I read each day in the threads. Many of you have a lot to say. So instead of leaving a 300-word comment on a thread, make a fanpost about it. Step onto the stage and give us your take.

Here's the deal: I promise to front-page any and all quality Fanposts. You will get top-billing based on when you posted, since it's all first-come-first-serve at the moment. Your work can be "above the fold"! All you gotta do it bring it. Give us your best, and you'll get rewarded with big-time readership!

Free hints to a good Fanpost, after the jump.

Hint 1: The TITLE is everything

Your title needs to be relevant, and it needs to be a teaser. It needs to draw the readers in. Too many titles are conclusions, which allows the reader to yay/nay before even hitting the link to read the article. We all want to be provocative, but do it in a way that makes the reader hit the link.

Bad title: Suns will win the championship this season!

Good title: Phoenix Suns Can Contend If ______ Becomes An All-Star

Hint 2: don't make outrageous claims, or predict that 90% of the roster will reach their highest potential in the same season

The quickest way to turn off most of the readers is to make a claim that makes the average person wince.

Sample wince-inducing comment: "Michael Beasley will be an excellent defender and rebounder in 2012-13 because he has long arms and was a #2 pick!"

Hint 3: The best articles provoke discussion, not suppress it

Don't go on the attack before anyone has even had a chance to shoot down your argument. Saying something louder or more vociferously doesn't make it any more believable. Words are words. You shouldn't have to write them in big, scary ways or preface them with slanderous attacks against naysayers. If its a solid take, you will get as many defenders as attackers in the comments section.

So be interesting, get the discussion going, and research your material for a minute or two to make sure it's at least accurate.

Folks, it's with great pleasure that I unveil the first step in the next evolution of the Phoenix Suns' #1 blog, BRIGHT SIDE OF THE SUN. I am very excited for what's about to come to all the blogs of SB Nation, including this one.

First, a new logo!


In the next month, SB Nation will be undergoing a dramatic upgrade to our platform and our editorial process. There will be much more detail to come but for now, the new logo below is just a first taste of what is coming for the BRIGHT SIDE OF THE SUN!

This is a small, but important sample of what is coming when our network undergoes its most exciting and radical transformation in the eight-year history of the company. A new visual identity here and across the network is only one step we are taking to unite our network of sites. United through individuality is the underlying theme of this project.

You'll notice that our team colors and the unique spirit of our individual community is maintained while making it clear to sports fans that each site is a part of the larger SB Nation network. We want everyone to know that they can find the same type of great writing, video and conversation that we offer here on all of our 350 plus sites. You can browse through all the new logos on a special page we put together at sbnation.com/united.

Our commitment to passionately follow our sports will never end. It's what makes SB Nation a special place and that will only be enhanced by these new changes. In the meantime we're setting up additions to our store so you can be sporting the latest and greatest before it even launches.

Welcome to our future!

Call it an extreme case of peer admiration or in all likelihood a small sample size, but back in March, when Sports Illustrated ranked the top 15 best pure shooters in the NBA based on player voting,...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

When this week's network-wide theme came up, I drew a blank. The Phoenix Suns have had their issues over the years in terms of disappointing front office moves, disappointing coin flips and disappointing playoff finishes.

But disappointing individual players? Hmmm. That's where I am a bit stuck. The Suns have rarely fielded a player who massively, historically disappointed the masses in his performance. The Colangelos always drafted and signed quality individual people who happened to play the game of basketball. And when they took a chance on a person of questionable character (Chambers, Barkley), those guys cleaned up their acts and outperformed their expectations.

But there were a few who didn't measure up to the Suns expectations at some point.

You could point out Walter Davis, the six-time all-star who developed an addiction and spent time in rehab 27 years ago. But he was such a good player for the mid-80s Suns and was so loved by the fans, I just can't see Sweet D winning this "competition".

Then there was Jason Kidd who came to the Suns with such promise and skill, a PG who could have led the Suns to big things in the Valley. Jason Kidd was the best passer in the league and one of the best defenders. His pairing with Anfernee Hardaway was supposed to be "Backcourt 2000". But then he beat his wife and "poof" he was traded before the dust even settled. We got Starbury, while the Nets got back-to-back NBA Finals appearances.

But do Suns fans look back on Jason Kidd as a disappointment? Not really. Colangelo traded him faster than the fans could officially turn against the kid. And young, exciting Stephon Marbury replaced him. So, all's well that ends well, right?

There was Oliver Miller in the mid-90s, who ate his way out of the league.


via theheatmag.com

Maybe be qualifies? The guy was a good NBA center, despite being short for his position, was a great passer and had a deft touch around the basket. But then he gained weight rather than lost it, and pretty soon couldn't keep up on the court. You could qualify Oliver as a bust and a disappointment for sure.

He lasted only two seasons in Phoenix before heading to Detroit a year as a free agent, then was unprotected by Detroit and drafted by expansion Toronto for a year before being released. He spent time between Dallas and Toronto for a few years, only to end up back in Phoenix for one more season before being entirely out of the league for a couple years until a brief stint in Minnesota. 11 years, 9 seasons, 7 teams. Never playing more than 76 games in any year and only 2 years where he started more than 22 of them. His best year (Detroit) ended in him being left unprotected. Ouch.

And then there was Richard Dumas.


via www.thelostogle.com

If ever there was a guy who makes me shake my head in wonder, just full of disbelief that he threw his career down the drain so soon and so abjectly, it's Richard Dumas. I loved that kid, loved the way he played so effortlessly and effectively.

He was drafted by the Suns in 1991 with the pick they got for unloading accused drug dealer James Edwards to Detroit in 1988, but was banned for a year from the NBA for substance abuse.

He got clean and literally burst onto the scene with one of the two best teams in the NBA. By far, the very best season of his career was the dream season of 1992-93. Richard was a rookie, but somehow earned a starting spot for 32 games on a 62-win team that went all the way to the Finals. He averaged 15.8 points per game, plus 4.6 rebounds, 1.3 assists and 1.8 steals. Per game. Not "per 36 minutes". That was only in 27.5 minutes per game as a rookie. Unfortunately, he got a stress fracture during the 1992-93 playoffs, and some people to this day blame the Finals loss on missing Dumas' presence.

And then the wheels really fell off. He was banned again the next season (1993-94), then played only 54 games the next two seasons after that - playing very pedestrian - before being released in the summer of 1995. He got only one more chance, with John Lucas in Philly, but only lasted a year there.

Talk about a total flameout. That's my call for biggest Suns disappointment ever.

Who gets your vote for biggest Suns disappointment ever?

  637 votes | Results

Page 1106 of 1842


Web Links

Sponsored Ads