X350_medium

To countdown the days (4 left) until D-Day, your faithful servants here at Bright Side of the Sun will try their best to bring you a wee bit of knowledge about some of the likely candidates to be chosen by the Phoenix Suns. Be excellent to each other.

As we look at draft prospects, comparisons to proven NBA players provide a point of reference. Sometimes they're a bit optimistic, but they tell us the mold of the player. Jimmer Fredette idolizes Steve Nash. Chris Singleton compares himself to Scottie Pippen. Bismack Biyombo has "Ben Wallace" written all over him as a best case scenario, while Kenneth Faried projects as a Lou Amundson-type hustle player. May I interest Suns fans in a player who models his game after Paul Pierce? Jump it to meet Texas SG/SF Jordan Hamilton.

Tale of the tape

Jordan Hamilton

  • College: Texas, played 2 years of college basketball.
  • Age: 20
  • Height/Weight: 6'8", 228 lbs
  • 2010/2011 stats: 18.6 PPG, 7.7 RPG, 2.1 APG on 48.1% 2 ptrs and 38.5% 3 ptrs

Hamilton is a smooth scorer, a volume shooter who is also efficient. He attempted 6.5 3s per 32 minutes last year, making 39% of them. While an excellent spot up shooter, Hamilton showed significant improvement in his second year at Texas at creating his own shots with runners, mid-range jumpers and floaters. His length allows him to get his shot off against most other SGs and he has terrific size for the NBA as well, comparing favorably to Joe Johnson in that area. Scouts agree that Hamilton will score effectively at the NBA level, and should be able to contribute right away. Texas won 28 games with him as their go-to scorer last year, as Hamilton was named 2nd team All-American and made the Academic All-Big 12 team. He may have left school early, but he's no dummy. Let's hear from Hamilton himself.

Defensively, he's a work in progress. His fundamentals are poor right now and, as per Draft Express, "his intensity level isn't very high". Matt Patton of the Big 12 Hoops blog here on SBN paints a more positive picture of Hamilton's work on that end of the floor (note also that he has Hamilton as Texas' MVP last season, and not Tristan Thompson) but I think it's safe to say that defense is not his strength. Regardless, here's their summary at DE:

All in all, Hamilton is clearly a big time offensive talent with a game that is probably better suited for the more wide-open style of the NBA. The superior spacing and faster pace of the professional game will make his shooting and overall scoring ability stand out even more. If he wants to reach his full potential, though, he must improve his mentality on both ends of the floor.

Hmm, does that remind you of any particular NBA team? A certain one with a floppy-haired Canadian point guard and a coach who often ends sentences with "OK?" Hamilton could do a lot of the things Jason Richardson used to do for the Suns except that, at age 20, there is still hope that Hamilton's questionable defense can improve, while J-Rich is what he is at this point in his career. And, Hamilton's rebounding average of 7.7 per game last year translates to 8.6 per 36 minutes, outstanding even for a small forward should he end up playing that position, and stellar for a shooting guard.

I hear the questions you all have. "Aren't the Suns trying to add defense and either a big man or a PG to succeed Nash? Hamilton sounds like more of the same for this team. He also sounds more like a SF, and don't we already have like 25 of them?"

Fair questions, but hear this: none of the current Suns wing players have the dynamic scoring potential of Hamilton. Grant Hill obviously did in his prime, but he'll be 39 when next season eventually begins and his prime is far behind him. Jared Dudley showed some promise in expanding his offensive game, but how much more can realistically be expected? Josh Childress' jump shot is, um, not great. And Mickael Pietrus is a loose cannon chucker, albeit an occasionally effective one.

Besides, how many of those guys do we expect to be around for the long haul? While it might seem like Hill will play forever, he won't. Would love to keep Dudley for years, but we might need to trade him to secure help elsewhere. Pietrus is also a trade chip, and he's in the last year of his contract. Due to Childress' contract, he's probably here for awhile, but his game isn't Hamilton's. Adding Hamilton adds no redundancy of skill set.

A team's needs change, so we have to think long-term. The most important thing in the draft is that you end up with an NBA-skilled player. Hamilton's that player. I have no doubt he'll have a long career in which he scores a lot of points. His defensive weaknesses can be improved through maturity and coaching. He has the tools to be fine on that end. It won't address our needs at PF or PG if we draft a player at one of those positions who isn't legitimate. Hamilton is legitimate at what he does. Let's look at some more pretty moving pictures.

In a weak draft, getting Hamilton at #13 would provide great value, and I want him on the Suns. He has weaknesses, but all of the prospects do. His strengths outweigh them, and will be magnified playing on the Suns. This is a player who can grow into a guy we want taking late game shots, and those aren't easy to find. At the very least, he's firepower off the bench. Sure, it won't address our needs at other positions, but that's where Babby and Blanks need to earn their keep and pull off a shrewd trade or two. Drafting a PF just to "fill a need" won't do us any good unless the PF we take is the real deal, and the ones who are likely to be available at #13 aren't all that impressive.

What say you? If Hamilton's available at #13, should we draft him?

Poll
Should the Suns draft Jordan Hamilton if he's available at #13?

  209 votes | Results


Coro: Gortat Staying With Suns; PF Likely Coming At #13

They surely are not pushing to trade center Marcin Gortat to Minnesota, a rumor that got so out of hand that Gortat received a call to assure him it was not happening.

There is a strong possibility that the Suns will keep their No. 13 overall pick and choose from a group of decent power forwards expected to be there.


College and NBA performance is correlated but the correlation isn’t perfect, as James Brocato writes on the Wages of Wins Journal. Still, taking a look at the Position Adjusted Win Score per 40...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]
Even the facial expression and pony tail remind me of a recent former Sun (AP Photo/Jack Dempsey, File)

To countdown the days (5 left) until D-Day, your faithful servants here at Bright Side of the Sun will try their best to bring you a wee bit of knowledge about some of the likely candidates to be chosen by the Phoenix Suns.  Comment, REC, kill it and continue to be awesome.

If you're looking for the guy least likely to bust, a player who will hustle and compete like nobody's business, a player who knows his limitations and stays within his skillset, then Kenneth Faried is your man.

If you're looking for a backup frontcourt player (at 6'7" he played C for his college team) who will make the most of every single second he spends on the court, even if that's committing a foul or turnover for every rebound or steal but overall having a positive impact on the game, then Kenneth Faried is your guy.

If you're looking for a guy who projects somewhere between Lou Amundson and DeJuan Blair for your rotation for the next 10 years, then Kenneth Faried is your guy.

Make no mistake: Kenneth Faried is a game-changer. T-shirts will be sold. Chants will be heard. Much the same way as Sweet Lou and a number of other, similarly undersized forwards who compete with heart and soul.

Watch this extremely interesting video profile on Faried and you'll know why I think of Sweet Louuuu when I watch him play. The video focuses on a game against Ohio State where Faried spent much of the time matched up to Jared Sullinger (top-5 talent) and Dallas Lauderdale (not) as the pivot man on a really poor Moorehead State team.

On the plus side, Faried played very well against top talent (Sullinger in this case), though no one on Ohio State in that game was taller than 6'9". It's likely Faried will have a tougher time in the paint against taller NBA players.

On the downside, he's clearly used to being under the basket and can't be counted on for offense.

But can he be successful? Hells to the yeah!

His scouting report on nbadraft.net

High energy post player who excels at doing the dirty work, in particular rebounding, defending and banging in the post ... Plays with exuberance and aggressiveness ... An above average, fluid athlete who is willing to sacrifice his body

In his 15 minutes, he can get you half-dozen key rebounds, a block or two and a couple putbacks. But those 15 minutes will also produce about 4 fouls, 3 free-throw misses and a couple turnovers. On a good night, he'll get some extra run and maybe pull down 20 rebounds. On a bad night, he'll pick up 2 quick fouls and make nary an impact.

Check out his weaknesses from that same scouting report. Sound familiar?

Touch and consistency are not great. Scores mostly on put backs and buckets where he gains deep position in the paint, or is able to outclass opponents with his athleticism ... A poor free throw shooter at below 60% throughout his college career. Doesn't have terrible form, but needs to focus and improve his routine some ... Passing and vision are limited. Needs to decrease turnovers. Gets far too many giveaways for someone that doesn't really use the bounce to set up baskets nor look to create offense for others ... Average at finishing non-dunks around the basket ...

And here's a warning shot across the bow (from draftexpress.com - link above) for those who think collegiate rebounding is all you need succeed in the NBA:

Looking at the top rebounders in our database over the past decade, it is clear that being an elite NCAA rebounder does not guarantee a NBA career. Amongst the top 100 collegiate rebounders in the past nine years, 34 prospects have made it to the NBA. Five of those 34 signed as undrafted free agents, nine were selected in the second round and 20 garnered a guaranteed contact as first round picks.

From DraftExpress.com http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Kenneth-Faried-5325/#ixzz1PdPLn91E
http://www.draftexpress.com

 

So it depends on what you want in this draft.

You want a sure thing, role-playing fan favorite whose ceiling is slightly higher than Lou Amundson?

Or, do you want a future all-star for a team already chock full of role players?

If you want the former, take Faried.

 

Draft Implications

Faried doesn't seem to fit the mold of a #13 pick, but he sure fits at the #20 range. If the third-hand rumored swap goes down of Gortat for the #2, it's possible the Suns will swap the 13 for Minny's 20 depending on what Minny is sending back to the Suns to match Gortat's salary. Guys who the Suns have worked out that fit best in the lower end of the first round: Jordan Hamilton, Iman Shumpert, Josh Selby and Kenneth Faried.

Here are some recent tweets with regard to Minny's #20 pick:

Givony-20_medium


Nash Could be Nowitzki

"You have to keep him," Kerr said. "To me, Steve Nash is the Suns organization. He's what you want the organization to be about. He's the perfect example of what you want your young players to become. So to me, it's a no-brainer. You keep Steve, he retires as a Sun, and you put him in the Ring of Honor."


Page 1001 of 1405

1001

Sponsored Ads