To countdown the days (4 left) until D-Day, your faithful servants here at Bright Side of the Sun will try their best to bring you a wee bit of knowledge about some of the likely candidates to be chosen by the Phoenix Suns. Be excellent to each other.
As we look at draft prospects, comparisons to proven NBA players provide a point of reference. Sometimes they're a bit optimistic, but they tell us the mold of the player. Jimmer Fredette idolizes Steve Nash. Chris Singleton compares himself to Scottie Pippen. Bismack Biyombo has "Ben Wallace" written all over him as a best case scenario, while Kenneth Faried projects as a Lou Amundson-type hustle player. May I interest Suns fans in a player who models his game after Paul Pierce? Jump it to meet Texas SG/SF Jordan Hamilton.Tale of the tape
- College: Texas, played 2 years of college basketball.
- Age: 20
- Height/Weight: 6'8", 228 lbs
- 2010/2011 stats: 18.6 PPG, 7.7 RPG, 2.1 APG on 48.1% 2 ptrs and 38.5% 3 ptrs
Hamilton is a smooth scorer, a volume shooter who is also efficient. He attempted 6.5 3s per 32 minutes last year, making 39% of them. While an excellent spot up shooter, Hamilton showed significant improvement in his second year at Texas at creating his own shots with runners, mid-range jumpers and floaters. His length allows him to get his shot off against most other SGs and he has terrific size for the NBA as well, comparing favorably to Joe Johnson in that area. Scouts agree that Hamilton will score effectively at the NBA level, and should be able to contribute right away. Texas won 28 games with him as their go-to scorer last year, as Hamilton was named 2nd team All-American and made the Academic All-Big 12 team. He may have left school early, but he's no dummy. Let's hear from Hamilton himself.
Defensively, he's a work in progress. His fundamentals are poor right now and, as per Draft Express, "his intensity level isn't very high". Matt Patton of the Big 12 Hoops blog here on SBN paints a more positive picture of Hamilton's work on that end of the floor (note also that he has Hamilton as Texas' MVP last season, and not Tristan Thompson) but I think it's safe to say that defense is not his strength. Regardless, here's their summary at DE:
All in all, Hamilton is clearly a big time offensive talent with a game that is probably better suited for the more wide-open style of the NBA. The superior spacing and faster pace of the professional game will make his shooting and overall scoring ability stand out even more. If he wants to reach his full potential, though, he must improve his mentality on both ends of the floor.
Hmm, does that remind you of any particular NBA team? A certain one with a floppy-haired Canadian point guard and a coach who often ends sentences with "OK?" Hamilton could do a lot of the things Jason Richardson used to do for the Suns except that, at age 20, there is still hope that Hamilton's questionable defense can improve, while J-Rich is what he is at this point in his career. And, Hamilton's rebounding average of 7.7 per game last year translates to 8.6 per 36 minutes, outstanding even for a small forward should he end up playing that position, and stellar for a shooting guard.
I hear the questions you all have. "Aren't the Suns trying to add defense and either a big man or a PG to succeed Nash? Hamilton sounds like more of the same for this team. He also sounds more like a SF, and don't we already have like 25 of them?"
Fair questions, but hear this: none of the current Suns wing players have the dynamic scoring potential of Hamilton. Grant Hill obviously did in his prime, but he'll be 39 when next season eventually begins and his prime is far behind him. Jared Dudley showed some promise in expanding his offensive game, but how much more can realistically be expected? Josh Childress' jump shot is, um, not great. And Mickael Pietrus is a loose cannon chucker, albeit an occasionally effective one.
Besides, how many of those guys do we expect to be around for the long haul? While it might seem like Hill will play forever, he won't. Would love to keep Dudley for years, but we might need to trade him to secure help elsewhere. Pietrus is also a trade chip, and he's in the last year of his contract. Due to Childress' contract, he's probably here for awhile, but his game isn't Hamilton's. Adding Hamilton adds no redundancy of skill set.
A team's needs change, so we have to think long-term. The most important thing in the draft is that you end up with an NBA-skilled player. Hamilton's that player. I have no doubt he'll have a long career in which he scores a lot of points. His defensive weaknesses can be improved through maturity and coaching. He has the tools to be fine on that end. It won't address our needs at PF or PG if we draft a player at one of those positions who isn't legitimate. Hamilton is legitimate at what he does. Let's look at some more pretty moving pictures.
In a weak draft, getting Hamilton at #13 would provide great value, and I want him on the Suns. He has weaknesses, but all of the prospects do. His strengths outweigh them, and will be magnified playing on the Suns. This is a player who can grow into a guy we want taking late game shots, and those aren't easy to find. At the very least, he's firepower off the bench. Sure, it won't address our needs at other positions, but that's where Babby and Blanks need to earn their keep and pull off a shrewd trade or two. Drafting a PF just to "fill a need" won't do us any good unless the PF we take is the real deal, and the ones who are likely to be available at #13 aren't all that impressive.
What say you? If Hamilton's available at #13, should we draft him?